<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.9.2 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:46:33 GMT--><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><title>Tech Kindred</title><subtitle>Blog</subtitle><id>http://chad.wathington.com/blog/</id><link rel="alternate" type="application/xhtml+xml" href="http://chad.wathington.com/blog/"/><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://chad.wathington.com/blog/atom.xml"/><updated>2009-11-04T18:49:33Z</updated><generator uri="http://www.squarespace.com/" version="Squarespace Site Server v5.9.2 (http://www.squarespace.com/)">Squarespace</generator><entry><title>Google Wave Integration</title><id>http://chad.wathington.com/blog/2009/11/4/google-wave-integration.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://chad.wathington.com/blog/2009/11/4/google-wave-integration.html"/><author><name>Chad Wathington</name></author><published>2009-11-04T18:45:22Z</published><updated>2009-11-04T18:45:22Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>Today, I presented at Enterprise 2.0 during the keynote with Greg D'alesandre from Google on Mingle Wave integration.&nbsp; You can learn more about the integration here:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://studios.thoughtworks.com/mingle-agile-project-management/mingle-and-google-wave">http://studios.thoughtworks.com/mingle-agile-project-management/mingle-and-google-wave</a></p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Twist Public Beta</title><id>http://chad.wathington.com/blog/2008/9/29/twist-public-beta.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://chad.wathington.com/blog/2008/9/29/twist-public-beta.html"/><author><name>Chad Wathington</name></author><published>2008-09-29T19:40:43Z</published><updated>2008-09-29T19:40:43Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>Today, we launched Twist the third product from ThoughtWorks Studios.&nbsp; It's a public beta so please give us your feedback.</p><p><a href="http://studios.thoughtworks.com/twist">Twist</a><br></p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>2 Eco-technologies I don't understand</title><id>http://chad.wathington.com/blog/2008/9/9/2-eco-technologies-i-dont-understand.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://chad.wathington.com/blog/2008/9/9/2-eco-technologies-i-dont-understand.html"/><author><name>Chad Wathington</name></author><published>2008-09-09T16:08:11Z</published><updated>2008-09-09T16:08:11Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>I'm into the new discovery show <a href="http://dsc.discovery.com/tv/project-earth/project-earth.html">Project Earth</a>, which is an 8 episode series that tests some promising theories that could save the planet from global warming.&nbsp; It's an ambitious subject to tackle, and they've done a solid job so far explaining the limits of what each series of experiments can do.&nbsp; At the end of each show they talk about why the theories, even if proved possible by their experiments, may or may not be good ideas.</p><p>So, along those lines, I have some relatively obvious misgivings about some mainstream eco-technologies. I'm wondering where's the "may not" opinions on technologies we've already accepted as good and if a professional climatologist could enlighten me.<br></p><p>1) Everyone loves to talk about wind power these days.&nbsp; But, wind turbines (high altitude and low) deflect the wind or at least lessen its flow in the direction it travels. Do wind turbines ultimately affect weather patterns if they reach a certain saturation point in a localized area? Seems like they would to me.&nbsp; Maybe that saturation point is not within any near term time horizon, but I've never heard anyone talk about weather pattern changes as a possible undesired effect.</p><p>2) Hydrogen cars seem problematic as well.&nbsp; I often read articles singing the virtues of cars that "have water as their only emissions."&nbsp; Huh?&nbsp; It's not C02, but that sounds like a terrible idea. In a world where hydrogen cars are the standard,&nbsp; I can't understand how releasing that much water vapor into the air, particularly in urban areas, is a good idea.&nbsp; Dry climates would become more humid, and humid climates would get worse. Sounds like it's another climate catastrophe waiting to happen.&nbsp;</p><p>But, I'm not a climatologist, so if there are some out there reading my blog, feel free to take shots :)</p><p><br></p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Geek Grammar – Companies are singular kids</title><id>http://chad.wathington.com/blog/2008/6/16/geek-grammar-companies-are-singular-kids.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://chad.wathington.com/blog/2008/6/16/geek-grammar-companies-are-singular-kids.html"/><author><name>Chad Wathington</name></author><published>2008-06-16T23:59:02Z</published><updated>2008-06-16T23:59:02Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>I&rsquo;ve noticed a very weird grammar error seemingly prevent only in geek circles.&nbsp; (Maybe it&rsquo;s happening in the larger English language, but I haven&rsquo;t seen it general.)&nbsp; It&rsquo;s a tendency to refer to companies as plurals instead of singular entities.&nbsp; For example:</p><pre>Google have done XYZ. (Correct grammar: Google has&hellip;)</pre><pre>ThoughtWorks are working on ABC. (Correct grammar: ThoughtWorks is&hellip;)<br /></pre><p>Companies are singular, not plural.&nbsp; In the same way that the word &ldquo;everyone&rdquo; encompasses a reference to many people but is still singular, proper names for companies are singular.&nbsp; Essentially, there is only one ThoughtWorks.&nbsp; I admit that I make casual grammar mistakes all the time, but because I see this one growing I had to speak out&hellip; ;) Stop it my geek friends. Stop it.<br /><br /></p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Smog In Beijing</title><id>http://chad.wathington.com/blog/2008/5/3/smog-in-beijing.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://chad.wathington.com/blog/2008/5/3/smog-in-beijing.html"/><author><name>Chad Wathington</name></author><published>2008-05-03T00:17:56Z</published><updated>2008-05-03T00:17:56Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="400" height="300" data="http://www.flickr.com/apps/video/stewart.swf?v=49235" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000"> <param name="flashvars" value="intl_lang=en-us&amp;photo_secret=708b22de64&amp;photo_id=2460652078"></param> <param name="movie" value="http://www.flickr.com/apps/video/stewart.swf?v=49235"></param> <param name="bgcolor" value="#000000"></param> <param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.flickr.com/apps/video/stewart.swf?v=49235" bgcolor="#000000" allowfullscreen="true" flashvars="intl_lang=en-us&amp;photo_secret=708b22de64&amp;photo_id=2460652078" height="300" width="400"></embed></object></p>

<p><br />  <span class="flickr-caption"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/chad_dub/2460652078/">Smog In Beijing</a>, originally uploaded by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/chad_dub/">Chad Dub</a>.</span>              <p class="flickr-yourcomment">  A lot of friends have asked me about what the pollution is like in Beijing. This week was particularly bad vs. my previous trips. I love Beijing, but this week was like smoking a pack a day. What looks like fog, clouds, or smoke above is smog. It was rough.<br /><br />Hopefully, by the big 08.08.08, the city will have this sorted.  It would be ashame to have this ruin the Olympic party.</p></p>
]]></content></entry><entry><title>[Semi-Off Topic] Please vote for better espresso at Starbucks</title><category term="Software"/><id>http://chad.wathington.com/blog/2008/4/9/semi-off-topic-please-vote-for-better-espresso-at-starbucks.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://chad.wathington.com/blog/2008/4/9/semi-off-topic-please-vote-for-better-espresso-at-starbucks.html"/><author><name>Chad Wathington</name></author><published>2008-04-09T06:49:54Z</published><updated>2008-04-09T06:49:54Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>So, Starbucks has a <a class="offsite-link-inline" href="http://mix.oracle.com" target="_blank">Mix</a> and <a class="offsite-link-inline" href="http://www.dellideastorm.com/" target="_blank">IdeaStorm</a>-like social network for product suggestions, called mystarbucksidea.&nbsp; Today, Starbucks announced a new style of brewed coffee called "<a class="offsite-link-inline" href="http://www.starbucks.com/aboutus/pressdesc.asp?id=855" target="_blank">Pike Place Roast</a>" to address the common customer complaint&nbsp; of a burnt/bitter taste.&nbsp; I have complained for years about this burnt-style, and unfortunately I think it's rubbed off on other main-stream coffee providers.&nbsp; Dunkin' Donuts used to have some good brewed sweet stuff, but the Starbucks trend ruined it.&nbsp; Luckily, smaller cafes and chains have started to reverse this trend over the past few years, and now Starbucks is listening.</p>
<p>While I think Pike Place is a solid start, we're still stuck with the same burnt tasting espresso-based drinks.&nbsp; I'm not sure why they introduced Pike Place only for brewed coffee, but it seems pretty lame to me.&nbsp; So, I joined the social network to "share my idea," or more accurately complain.&nbsp; So, if you drink coffee, please take a minute to vote for it:</p>
<p><a class="offsite-link-inline" href="http://mystarbucksidea.force.com/ideas/viewIdea.apexp?id=087500000004UHV">Vote for more mellow espresso drinks at Starbucks&nbsp;</a></p>
<p>I knew this network existed.&nbsp; But what I didn't realize is that it's a salesforce.com application.&nbsp; It's logical, in that this customer ideation is an extension of CRM, but I didn't know that salesforce hosted consumer facing apps.&nbsp; When I did a little digging, I realized that IdeamStorm is a Dell version of the same app.&nbsp; Mix seems to be the only custom CRM social network around.&nbsp; Anyone know of any others?</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Python in the Cloud: Google App Engine</title><category term="Dynamic Languages"/><id>http://chad.wathington.com/blog/2008/4/8/python-in-the-cloud-google-app-engine.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://chad.wathington.com/blog/2008/4/8/python-in-the-cloud-google-app-engine.html"/><author><name>Chad Wathington</name></author><published>2008-04-08T03:03:49Z</published><updated>2008-04-08T03:03:49Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>Hmm.. Google launched a new cloud-ish web development infrastructure platform called Google App Engine.&nbsp; <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/07/google-jumps-head-first-into-web-services-with-google-app-engine/" target="_blank" class="offsite-link-inline">Tech Crunch</a> has an article.&nbsp; I wish this were Ruby based frankly or no language at all.&nbsp; I think AWS has it right: virtualization, restful APIs, and platform agnostic tech overall.&nbsp; This may drive Python adoption though, not that Python is bad.&nbsp; Ruby's just better ;)<br /></p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Domain Specific Languages and Next Gen Functional Testing</title><category term="Domain Specific Languages"/><id>http://chad.wathington.com/blog/2008/2/26/domain-specific-languages-and-next-gen-functional-testing.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://chad.wathington.com/blog/2008/2/26/domain-specific-languages-and-next-gen-functional-testing.html"/><author><name>Chad Wathington</name></author><published>2008-02-26T18:25:06Z</published><updated>2008-02-26T18:25:06Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>I wrote a white paper for a <a href="https://event.on24.com/eventRegistration/EventLobbyServlet?target=registration.jsp&eventid=101890&sessionid=1&key=D782070265CDCB73F873DD84B7884811&sourcepage=register" target="_blank" class="offsite-link-inline">webinar</a> on next generational functional testing that <a href="http://studios.thoughtworks.com" target="_blank" class="offsite-link-inline">we</a> sponsored.&nbsp; The webinar consists of two very interesting talks by <a class="offsite-link-inline" target="_blank" href="http://www.jennittaandrea.com/">Jennitta Andrea</a> and <a class="offsite-link-inline" target="_blank" href="http://c2.com/~ward/">Ward Cunningham</a>.&nbsp; You can view the archived webinar, which includes a small demo of the new testing product that we're building, albeit with a slight audio problem during that portion.&nbsp; The white paper I wrote is below.&nbsp; Sorry it's not in an RSS reader friendly format.</p><p><a href="http://chad.wathington.com/storage/dsls_for_functional_testing_thoughtworks_feb08.pdf"><strong>Domain Specific Languages for Functional Testing&nbsp;</strong></a></p><p>&nbsp;</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Firefox, Oh How You’ve Scorned Me</title><category term="product development"/><id>http://chad.wathington.com/blog/2008/2/7/firefox-oh-how-youve-scorned-me.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://chad.wathington.com/blog/2008/2/7/firefox-oh-how-youve-scorned-me.html"/><author><name>Chad Wathington</name></author><published>2008-02-07T19:14:24Z</published><updated>2008-02-07T19:14:24Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>My work life revolves around creating great <a class="offsite-link-inline" target="_blank" href="http://studios.thoughtworks.com">products</a>.&nbsp; Many software companies think about product development only in terms of features, markets, and price. I&rsquo;m amazed that some companies actually create products without an opinion, without a point of view, without a stake in the ground.&nbsp; They slap a bunch of features together, name it, and expect people to buy it because it addresses their pain. The product may not solve any user pain, but as long as it has a convincing story, the companies are content.&nbsp; Instead of delivering value, they rely only on marketing glitz, market power, or aggressive sales tactics to hawk their wares.<br /><br />However, successful product companies go beyond that.&nbsp; They want to delight their users.&nbsp; They want to create something that has a perspective beyond what potential buyers would say in a focus group.&nbsp; Theses companies create an emotional connection with their users.&nbsp; That connection buys companies a lot in terms of loyalty, even when they screw up.<br /><br />My loyalty for Firefox started when I downloaded the first public release before 1.0.&nbsp;&nbsp; Not only was it substantially faster and more lightweight feeling than IE, the little things were there.&nbsp; I loved the tabs&hellip; I loved the extensibility.&nbsp; And it had those features without the annoying ads that Opera put in the free version.&nbsp; That engendered loyalty kept me using it throughout the last few years; even when the memory leak on Windows was awful; and even when I switched from Windows to OS X.<br /><br />But, all good things come to an end.&nbsp;&nbsp; The feeling that I had &ndash; that Firefox somehow resonated with me &ndash; is gone.&nbsp; The latest build of Firefox crashes so much on Leopard it&rsquo;s totally unusable for me.&nbsp; I think my Firefox hates me, and loyalty can&rsquo;t transcend such severe disdain. However, at the end of the day, my loyalty hasn&rsquo;t shifted very far &ndash; I&rsquo;m using <a href="http://caminobrowser.org/" target="_blank" class="offsite-link-inline">Camino</a>.<br /><br /></p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>The One-third Rule</title><category term="Deployment"/><category term="Dynamic Languages"/><category term="Ruby"/><category term="Software"/><id>http://chad.wathington.com/blog/2007/12/28/the-one-third-rule.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://chad.wathington.com/blog/2007/12/28/the-one-third-rule.html"/><author><name>Chad Wathington</name></author><published>2007-12-28T15:32:34Z</published><updated>2007-12-28T15:32:34Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[If it takes you longer than a third of your development time to deploy a web application, including acceptance testing, then your deployment process is broken.]]></summary></entry></feed>